Skip to main content
Download PDF

Rapidly progressive brain atrophy in septic ICU patients: a retrospective descriptive study using semiautomatic CT volumetry

Critical Care volume 25, Article number: 411 (2021) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Sepsis is often associated with multiple organ failure; however, changes in brain volume with sepsis are not well understood. We assessed brain atrophy in the acute phase of sepsis using brain computed tomography (CT) scans, and their findings’ relationship to risk factors and outcomes.

Methods

Patients with sepsis admitted to an intensive care unit (ICU) and who underwent at least two head CT scans during hospitalization were included (n = 48). The first brain CT scan was routinely performed on admission, and the second and further brain CT scans were obtained whenever prolonged disturbance of consciousness or abnormal neurological findings were observed. Brain volume was estimated using an automatic segmentation method and any changes in brain volume between the two scans were recorded. Patients with a brain volume change < 0% from the first CT scan to the second CT scan were defined as the “brain atrophy group (n = 42)”, and those with ≥ 0% were defined as the “no brain atrophy group (n = 6).” Use and duration of mechanical ventilation, length of ICU stay, length of hospital stay, and mortality were compared between the groups.

Results

Analysis of all 42 cases in the brain atrophy group showed a significant decrease in brain volume (first CT scan: 1.041 ± 0.123 L vs. second CT scan: 1.002 ± 0.121 L, t (41) = 9.436, p < 0.001). The mean percentage change in brain volume between CT scans in the brain atrophy group was –3.7% over a median of 31 days, which is equivalent to a brain volume of 38.5 cm3. The proportion of cases on mechanical ventilation (95.2% vs. 66.7%; p = 0.02) and median time on mechanical ventilation (28 [IQR 15–57] days vs. 15 [IQR 0–25] days, p = 0.04) were significantly higher in the brain atrophy group than in the no brain atrophy group.

Conclusions

Many ICU patients with severe sepsis who developed prolonged mental status changes and neurological sequelae showed signs of brain atrophy. Patients with rapidly progressive brain atrophy were more likely to have required mechanical ventilation.

Background

Advances in the treatment of sepsis have improved short-term outcomes and increased the survival rate [1, 2]. However, it has been reported that long-term outcomes have not improved [3,4,5,6]. A secondary analysis of the “A Controlled Comparison of Eritoran and placebo in patients with Severe Sepsis” (ACCESS) trial and the “Prospective Recombinant Human Activated Protein C Worldwide Evaluation in Severe Sepsis” (PROWESS)-SHOCK trial found that of those surviving after treatment for severe sepsis, 33.1% and 34.3% had not returned to independent living by 6 months, respectively [4,5,6]. Brinkman et al. [3] reported that most intensive care unit (ICU) patients were still at higher risk of death than the general population in the years after discharge, and that those patients admitted for acute renal failure or pneumonia had a mortality rate of > 40% in the 3 years after discharge. Recently, there have been several reports using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) on the relationship between brain volume reduction and prognosis in patients receiving treatment in the ICU [7, 8]. Gunther et al. [7] found that in survivors treated in the ICU, the longer the duration of delirium, the smaller the brain volume up to 3 months after discharge, and smaller brain volume was associated with long-term cognitive impairment up to 12 months. Orhun et al. [8] reported that 16.1% of patients with sepsis-induced brain dysfunction had brain atrophy. Thus, it is important to evaluate changes in brain volume in the acute phase in critically ill patients; however, in clinical practice, MRI is difficult to obtain if the patient is on vasopressors or has unstable vital signs. In such a situation, images for neurological evaluation can only be obtained with head computed tomography (CT).

In this study, we examined the brain atrophy rate in the acute phase of sepsis using head CT scans, and its relationship to risk factors and outcomes.

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed demographic, clinical, and radiologic data of 555 consecutive sepsis cases treated at the Department of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Nippon Medical School Hospital, from January 2015 to December 2020. Diagnosis of sepsis was based on the Japanese clinical practice guidelines for management of sepsis and septic shock 2016 (J-SSCG 2016) [9]. The J-SSCG2016 covers a total of 19 clinical areas and includes 89 clinical questions, and was developed to meet the needs of clinicians managing conditions including sepsis and disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC). It was developed by 19 committee members and 52 working group members selected from the Japanese Society of Intensive Care Medicine and the Japanese Association for Acute Medicine (JAAM), in accordance with the procedures of the Medical Information Network Distribution Service (Minds). Exclusion criteria included age < 16 y; hospital length of stay < 15 d; comorbidities that may affect brain atrophy such as hypoxemia (PaO2 < 60 mmHg) at admission, aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage, intracerebral hemorrhage, cerebral infarction, traumatic brain injury, meningitis, carbon monoxide poisoning, drug toxicity, status epilepticus, hypoxic encephalopathy, brain death, hematological disease, and malignant disease; only a single CT scan during hospitalization; and the longest CT scan interval during hospitalization < 15 d. This resulted in a total of 48 cases (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Flowchart of patients enrolled in the present study. Of 555 patients with sepsis managed from January 2015 to December 2020, 48 patients were enrolled

Full size image

We collected data on patient age; sex; past history of hypertension, diabetes mellitus, and atrial fibrillation; Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score, sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) score [10], acute physiology and chronic health evaluation (APACHE) II score [11], and JAAM DIC score [12] at the time the diagnosis of sepsis was made; use of mechanical ventilation, vasopressor, heparin, antithrombin, and recombinant human soluble thrombomodulin (rhTM); and implementation of continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) and surgery.

Management of sepsis

Treatment was administered immediately at the time of diagnosis based on J-SSCG 2016 [9]. In our institution, brain CT scans are routinely performed on septic patients at the time of admission (first CT scan). A second or further brain CT scans are obtained whenever prolonged disturbance of consciousness or abnormal neurological findings are observed. Here, when CT scans were acquired ≥ 3 times, the last CT scan acquired during hospitalization was adopted as the second CT scan. Treatment options such as heparin, antithrombin, rhTM, CRRT, and surgery were at the discretion of the treating physician.

Evaluation of brain volume

Brain volume was automatically calculated from clinical routine CT images with 5 mm thick sections using commercial software (PMOD Version 4.002, PMOD Technologies Ltd., Zurich, Switzerland). We applied the methodology described by Adduru et al. [13, 14]. Briefly, intensity transformation was applied to original brain CT image data to enhance the tissue contrast between gray matter (GM), white matter (WM), and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF). Then, the scaled data were nonrigidly transformed to predefined template CT images as proposed by Rorden et al. [15]. As a result, the transformed images were registered to Montreal Neurological Institute (MNI) space. Six-compartment tissue segmentation using standard statistical parametric mapping (SPM) software Version 12 was adopted to separate GM, WM, CSF, bone, air, and other components according to the method of Ashburner and Friston [16]. The segmented images were then inversely transformed from MNI space to the original patients’ specific CT space. A volume of interest was drawn to include GM and WM to calculate the brain volume (Fig. 2). All steps were automatically performed without any user interaction.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Axial view of brain computed tomography (CT) scan of a 63-year-old man who was hospitalized and treated for 107 days for sepsis due to soft tissue infection. A and B are the first CT scan and C and D are the second CT scan of the patient. A and C are original brain CT scans and B and D are brain CT scans with a corresponding segmentation map where gray and white matter are colored red. Compared to the first CT scan (A), atrophy is evident on the second CT scan (C). Although small misclassifications are observed in the cerebellar vermis (arrows on B and D) and the right choroid plexus (white arrowhead on B), automatic segmentation was successful. Subtle beam-hardening artifact is found around the posterior fossa (red arrowheads on C),; it did not affect the classification. A 7.4% decrease in brain volume was calculated by the automatic algorithm

Full size image

After the calculation, one neuroradiologist (T.S.) validated the results of segmentation without any clinical information such as patient background or scan order (i.e. first or second). Seven datasets with segmentation error were excluded. Four had severe motion artifact either in the first or second CT scan and three had misclassification of CSF due to abnormal brain morphology.

Group classification

After assessing for change in brain volume between the first and second CT scans, we assigned patients with brain volume change < 0% from the first CT scan to the second CT scan to the “brain atrophy group (n = 42)” and those with ≥ 0% to the “no brain atrophy group (n = 6).” The demographic characteristics of each group were compared, including the need for and length of time on mechanical ventilation, length of ICU stay, length of hospital stay, mortality, prevalence of delirium as assessed using the confusion assessment method for the intensive care unit (CAM-ICU) [17] until second CT scan, and Medical Research Council (MRC) score. The MRC score, ranging from 0 to 60, was assessed during early awakening in surviving patients as an indicator of ICU-acquired weakness (ICU-AW) using six prespecified muscle groups [18]. CAM-ICU assessments were performed every 12 h by nurses, and MRC scores were assessed by physical therapists for muscle strength and scored by physicians.

Statistical analysis

Data are expressed as number (%), mean (standard deviation: SD), or median (interquartile range: IQR). Continuous variables were compared between groups using Student’s t-test or the Mann–Whitney U-test, and categorical variables using the χ2 test. A value of p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. All statistical analyses were performed using commercial software (SPSS Version 25.0®; IBM Corp., Armonk NY, USA).

Results

Analysis of all 42 cases in the brain atrophy group showed a significant decrease in brain volume (first CT scan: 1.041 ± 0.123 L vs. second CT scan: 1.002 ± 0.121 L, t (41) = 9.436, p < 0.001) (Fig. 3). Brain atrophy was diffuse, and not focal, in all cases.

Fig. 3
figure 3

Change in brain volume in the 42 cases in the brain atrophy group from the first computed tomography (CT) scan to the second CT scan

Full size image

Demographic and clinical characteristics of patients are summarized in Table 1. Median (IQR) of SOFA score and APACHE II score of the eligible cases were as high as 13 (11–15) and 27 (21–31), respectively, indicating that many cases with severe sepsis were included in the study. In addition, 39 (81.3%) cases met the DIC diagnostic criteria of JAAM DIC score ≥ 4. The groups were comparable with regard to age; sex; presence of medical histories such as hypertension, diabetes mellitus, and atrial fibrillation; and clinical scores such as GCS score, SOFA score, APACHE II score, and JAAM DIC score. The incidence of mechanical ventilation use was significantly higher in the brain atrophy group than in the no brain atrophy group (95.2% vs. 66.7%, p = 0.02) (Table 1).

Table 1 Characteristics of the study population
Full size table

Table 2 shows the brain volumes and other outcomes. The mean percentage change of brain volume between CT scans in the brain atrophy group was –3.7% (equivalent to a brain volume of 38.5 cm3) over a median of 31 days. The mortality rate did not significantly differ between the two groups. In patients on mechanical ventilation, the median length of mechanical ventilation was significantly higher in the brain atrophy group than in the no brain atrophy group (28 [IQR: 15–57] days vs. 15 [IQR: 0–25] days, p = 0.04) (Table 3). Excluding the 12 patients who remained comatose until the second CT scan or with a history of severe dementia, the incidence of delirium in both groups reached 66.7% (Table 4). Among patients without limb paralysis, the median MRC scores decreased substantially from the full score of 60 in both groups, suggesting muscle weakness, but with no significant difference between the two groups (Table 5).

Table 2 Clinical results
Full size table
Table 3 Time on mechanical ventilation and brain atrophy rate
Full size table
Table 4 Prevalence of delirium until second CT scan
Full size table
Table 5 Medical Research Council score in surviving patients
Full size table

Discussion

We found significant brain atrophy in patients with severe sepsis with a mean decrease in brain volume of − 3.7% (38.5 cm3) over a median of 31 days. Further brain atrophy was associated with the use and length of time on mechanical ventilation.

We have often observed the occurrence of brain atrophy in septic patients during a relatively short period of hospitalization (Additional file 1, 2: Figs. S1 and S2). Cerebral infarction due to hypoperfusion or DIC in septic patients has been reported [19, 20]. Although impaired cerebral blood flow (CBF) may be responsible for the atrophy observed in the present study, the mechanism is considered to differ from that with common cerebral infarction because there were no cases with new low-density areas on CT scans, and the atrophy was observed diffusely rather than focally. Considering that 35 (83.3%) of the 42 patients in the brain atrophy group were diagnosed with DIC with a JAAM DIC score ≥ 4 and that these patients were in a hypercoagulable state [21], diffuse atrophic change may have progressed due to diffuse infarction caused by microthrombi that were not reflected on CT scan. Chang [22] stated that in patients with sepsis, endotheliopathy is caused by the membrane-attack complex generated by complement activation, resulting in microthrombus formation and multiorgan dysfunction syndrome (MODS) caused by disseminated intravascular microthrombosis. We speculate that the same mechanism may be responsible for the occurrence of diffuse cerebral atrophy observed in this study as one of the MODS.

Our findings also suggest that rapidly progressive cerebral atrophy in septic patients was associated with mechanical ventilation. Although mechanical ventilation has the effect of improving oxygenation and alveolar recruitment, the increase in intrathoracic pressure caused by positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) can increase jugular venous pressure and inhibit cerebral venous outflow [23]. Impaired venous outflow leads to increased cerebral blood volume (CBV), resulting in increased intracranial pressure (ICP), potentially decreasing CBF [24, 25]. In addition, in patients with hemodynamic instability, PEEP up to 20 cm H2O has been shown to significantly decrease systemic venous return, leading to decreased cardiac output, which in turn decreases systemic blood pressure and cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP), decreasing CBF [26]. This mechanism is known as the Starling resistance model and represents the role of damaged venous outflow in the ICP response to PEEP [27]. This may act in concert with the cerebral hypoperfusion caused by sepsis. Recent animal studies have also suggested that brain atrophy associated with short-term mechanical ventilation may be caused by reduced amyloid-β clearance associated with brain outflow impairment [28].

Previous reports have shown that decreased brain volume is causally related to decreased motor and cognitive functions [29,30,31,32]. Kido et al. [30] reported that atrophy in the left cerebellum and left prefrontal cortex was associated with reduced walking speed, while atrophy in the right putamen, right posterior superior parietal cortex, and cerebellum were associated with balance difficulties. Gado et al. [29] reported that volume expansion of the CSF space on CT was a highly sensitive indicator for detecting cognitive ability. Therefore, it is possible that brain atrophy is a factor in the development of cognitive and physical impairment. Adduru et al. [13] reported that the Alzheimer’s disease group had 1.7% lower brain volume than the control group using an automatic segmentation method with CT scans. An MRI study by Tabatabaei-Jafari et al. [33] showed that the rate of overall brain atrophy in patients with newly diagnosed Alzheimer’s disease ranged from 1.83 to 2.71% per year. These results suggest that the 3.7% reduction in brain volume in this study is not negligible. Inflammation, oxidative damage, and neuronal apoptosis associated with sepsis have also been reported to cause neuronal damage and brain dysfunction [34, 35] and these changes have been observed in patients with long-term cognitive impairment [36].

Gunther et al. [7] found that in ICU-treated survivors, longer duration of delirium was associated with smaller brain volume up to 3 months post-discharge. As a mechanism, some studies have reported that regional cerebral blood flow in the frontal, temporal, and occipital cortices, and in the thalamus, basal ganglia, and pons is greatly reduced during acute delirium [37, 38]. In our study, the number of patients with delirium was also high, at 66.7% of all patients, but there was no significant difference between the brain atrophy and the no brain atrophy groups. In addition, Harvey et al. [39] showed that ICU-AW developed in 25%–80% of people who are ventilated for > 4 d and in 50–75% of people with sepsis. Similar to their study, the MRC score as an assessment of motor function was substantially decreased in the target patients in this study, but there was no significant difference between the brain atrophy group and the no brain atrophy group. One reason that these investigations did not show differences may be that the size of the no brain atrophy group was so small.

Although several studies have evaluated brain volume changes in septic patients using MRI [7, 8], no study has evaluated brain volume changes using CT scans. We performed automatic brain segmentation to calculate brain volume from clinical routine CT images with 5 mm thick sections. The standard method of brain volumetry uses high-resolution MRI as input [40]. However, in the clinical setting, MRI is difficult to acquire when patients are on vasopressors and have unstable vital signs. In that situation, we can obtain only brain CT images for neurological assessment. In segmentation of the brain, the low tissue contrast in CT hampers the objective evaluation of brain volume. To overcome this drawback, CT-based brain-volume calculation utilizing pre-defined CT-template images has been developed [15]. Compared to the gold-standard MRI-based volume estimates, this approach is sensitive enough to yield brain volume estimates within 3–5% [14]. The clinical utility of CT brain volumetry has already been validated in the discrimination of Alzheimer’s disease from controls [13]. We excluded three patients due to errors in automatic tissue classification. This rate (5.8%, 3/51) is not inferior to the previous reports (11.2%, 17/152) [13].

The strength of this study is that we used automatic CT brain volumetry to quantitatively assess brain volume. This technique requires only a computational cost of about 15 min per patient dataset and does not require an experienced operator. As CT data are expressed in the same standardized values (Hounsfield units) among different scanners, this method can be accurately applied to any CT scanner in multiple institutions. This automatic approach would likely be highly useful in the conduct of a much larger/multi-center cohort.

There are several limitations to our study. First, it was conducted as a retrospective study and selection bias was inevitable. Of the 555 patients with sepsis, only 48 cases met the inclusion criteria. The prolonged disturbance of consciousness and abnormal neurological findings that triggered the CT scan may be related to brain atrophy, and may have overdetected patients who presented with brain atrophy. However, the short time between scans would eliminate any contribution of age-related atrophy. Further large prospective studies are needed to validate our results. Second, since this study included patients who had had multiple head CT scans, most of the patients presented with severe sepsis or DIC complications. We found that patients with severe sepsis had a higher incidence of brain atrophy, but this is not considered to be generalizable to sepsis. Third, since this study was conducted on septic patients, we could not compare brain volumes with those of non-septic patients. Therefore, the results of this study may not indicate that rapidly progressive brain atrophy is a change specific to sepsis. Fourth, we did not investigate cognitive decline associated with brain atrophy. Finally, multivariate analysis was not performed because it could be assumed that the statistical model would be unstable.

Conclusions

Many ICU patients with severe sepsis who developed prolonged mental status changes and neurological sequelae showed signs of brain atrophy. Patients with rapidly progressive brain atrophy were more likely to have required mechanical ventilation.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets supporting the conclusions of this article will be provided based on reasonable request to the corresponding author.

Abbreviations

APACHE:

Acute physiology and chronic health evaluation

CAM-ICU:

Confusion assessment method for the intensive care unit

CBF:

Cerebral blood flow

CBV:

Cerebral blood volume

CPP:

Cerebral perfusion pressure

CRRT:

Continuous renal replacement therapy

CSF:

Cerebrospinal fluid

CT:

Computed tomography

DIC:

Disseminated intravascular coagulation

GCS:

Glasgow Coma Scale

GM:

Gray matter

ICP:

Intracranial pressure

ICU-AW:

Intensive care unit-acquired weakness

ICU:

Intensive care unit

IQR:

Interquartile range

J-SSCG:

Japanese clinical practice guidelines for management of sepsis and septic shock

JAAM:

Japanese association for acute medicine

MNI:

Montreal Neurological Institute

MODS:

Multiorgan dysfunction syndrome

MRC:

Medical Research Council

MRI:

Magnetic resonance imaging

PEEP:

Positive end-expiratory pressure

rhTM:

Recombinant human soluble thrombomodulin

SD:

Standard deviation

SOFA:

Sequential organ failure assessment

SPM:

Statistical parametric mapping

WM:

White matter

References

  1. Kaukonen KM, Bailey M, Suzuki S, Pilcher D, Bellomo R. Mortality related to severe sepsis and septic shock among critically ill patients in Australia and New Zealand, 2000–2012. JAMA. 2014;311:1308–16.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Martin GS, Mannino DM, Eaton S, Moss M. The epidemiology of sepsis in the United States from 1979 through 2000. N Engl J Med. 2003;348:1546–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Brinkman S, de Jonge E, Abu-Hanna A, Arbous MS, de Lange DW, de Keizer NF. Mortality after hospital discharge in ICU patients. Crit Care Med. 2013;41:1229–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Opal SM, Laterre PF, Francois B, LaRosa SP, Angus DC, Mira JP, et al. Effect of eritoran, an antagonist of MD2-TLR4, on mortality in patients with severe sepsis: the ACCESS randomized trial. JAMA. 2013;309:1154–62.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Ranieri VM, Thompson BT, Barie PS, Dhainaut JF, Douglas IS, Finfer S, et al. Drotrecogin alfa (activated) in adults with septic shock. N Engl J Med. 2012;366:2055–64.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Yende S, Austin S, Rhodes A, Finfer S, Opal S, Thompson T, et al. Long-term quality of life among survivors of severe sepsis: analyses of two international trials. Crit Care Med. 2016;44:1461–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Gunther ML, Morandi A, Krauskopf E, Pandharipande P, Girard TD, Jackson JC, et al. The association between brain volumes, delirium duration, and cognitive outcomes in intensive care unit survivors: the VISIONS cohort magnetic resonance imaging study*. Crit Care Med. 2012;40:2022–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Orhun G, Tuzun E, Bilgic B, Ergin Ozcan P, Sencer S, Barburoglu M, et al. Brain volume changes in patients with acute brain dysfunction due to sepsis. Neurocrit Care. 2020;32:459–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Nishida O, Ogura H, Egi M, Fujishima S, Hayashi Y, Iba T, et al. The Japanese clinical practice guidelines for management of sepsis and septic shock 2016 (J-SSCG 2016). J Intensive Care. 2018;6:7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Vincent JL, Moreno R, Takala J, Willatts S, De Mendonca A, Bruining H, et al. The SOFA (Sepsis-related organ failure assessment) score to describe organ dysfunction/failure. On behalf of the Working Group on Sepsis-Related Problems of the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine. Intensive Care Med. 1996;22:707–10.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Knaus WA, Draper EA, Wagner DP, Zimmerman JE. APACHE II: a severity of disease classification system. Crit Care Med. 1985;13:818–29.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Gando S, Iba T, Eguchi Y, Ohtomo Y, Okamoto K, Koseki K, et al. A multicenter, prospective validation of disseminated intravascular coagulation diagnostic criteria for critically ill patients: comparing current criteria. Crit Care Med. 2006;34:625–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Adduru V, Baum SA, Zhang C, Helguera M, Zand R, Lichtenstein M, et al. A method to estimate brain volume from head CT images and application to detect brain atrophy in Alzheimer disease. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2020;41:224–30.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Irimia A, Maher AS, Rostowsky KA, Chowdhury NF, Hwang DH, Law EM. Brain segmentation from computed tomography of healthy aging and geriatric concussion at variable spatial resolutions. Front Neuroinform. 2019;13:9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Rorden C, Bonilha L, Fridriksson J, Bender B, Karnath HO. Age-specific CT and MRI templates for spatial normalization. Neuroimage. 2012;61:957–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Ashburner J, Friston KJ. Unified segmentation. Neuroimage. 2005;26:839–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Ely EW, Inouye SK, Bernard GR, Gordon S, Francis J, May L, et al. Delirium in mechanically ventilated patients: validity and reliability of the confusion assessment method for the intensive care unit (CAM-ICU). JAMA. 2001;286:2703–10.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Stevens RD, Marshall SA, Cornblath DR, Hoke A, Needham DM, de Jonghe B, et al. A framework for diagnosing and classifying intensive care unit-acquired weakness. Crit Care Med. 2009;37:S299-308.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Oddo M, Taccone FS. How to monitor the brain in septic patients? Minerva Anestesiol. 2015;81:776–88.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Polito A, Eischwald F, Maho AL, Polito A, Azabou E, Annane D, et al. Pattern of brain injury in the acute setting of human septic shock. Crit Care. 2013;17:R204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Levi M, Schultz M, van der Poll T. Sepsis and thrombosis. Semin Thromb Hemost. 2013;39:559–66.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Chang JC. Sepsis and septic shock: endothelial molecular pathogenesis associated with vascular microthrombotic disease. Thromb J. 2019;17:10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Sasannejad C, Ely EW, Lahiri S. Long-term cognitive impairment after acute respiratory distress syndrome: a review of clinical impact and pathophysiological mechanisms. Crit Care. 2019;23:352.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Chen H, Menon DK, Kavanagh BP. Impact of altered airway pressure on intracranial pressure, perfusion, and oxygenation: a narrative review. Crit Care Med. 2019;47:254–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Nyquist P, Stevens RD, Mirski MA. Neurologic injury and mechanical ventilation. Neurocrit Care. 2008;9:400–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Muench E, Bauhuf C, Roth H, Horn P, Phillips M, Marquetant N, et al. Effects of positive end-expiratory pressure on regional cerebral blood flow, intracranial pressure, and brain tissue oxygenation. Crit Care Med. 2005;33:2367–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Luce JM, Huseby JS, Kirk W, Butler J. A Starling resistor regulates cerebral venous outflow in dogs. J Appl Physiol Respir Environ Exerc Physiol. 1982;53:1496–503.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Lahiri S, Regis GC, Koronyo Y, Fuchs DT, Sheyn J, Kim EH, et al. Acute neuropathological consequences of short-term mechanical ventilation in wild-type and Alzheimer’s disease mice. Crit Care. 2019;23:63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Gado M, Hughes CP, Danziger W, Chi D. Aging, dementia, and brain atrophy: a longitudinal computed tomographic study. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 1983;4:699–702.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Kido T, Tabara Y, Igase M, Ochi N, Uetani E, Nagai T, et al. Postural instability is associated with brain atrophy and cognitive impairment in the elderly: the J-SHIPP study. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord. 2010;29:379–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Luxenberg JS, Haxby JV, Creasey H, Sundaram M, Rapoport SI. Rate of ventricular enlargement in dementia of the Alzheimer type correlates with rate of neuropsychological deterioration. Neurology. 1987;37:1135–40.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Rosano C, Aizenstein HJ, Studenski S, Newman AB. A regions-of-interest volumetric analysis of mobility limitations in community-dwelling older adults. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2007;62:1048–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Tabatabaei-Jafari H, Shaw ME, Walsh E, Cherbuin N. Alzheimer’s disease neuroimaging initiative (ADNI). Regional brain atrophy predicts time to conversion to Alzheimer’s disease, dependent on baseline volume. Neurobiol Aging. 2019;83:86–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Comim CM, Barichello T, Grandgirard D, Dal-Pizzol F, Quevedo J, Leib SL. Caspase-3 mediates in part hippocampal apoptosis in sepsis. Mol Neurobiol. 2013;47:394–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Schwalm MT, Pasquali M, Miguel SP, Dos Santos JP, Vuolo F, Comim CM, et al. Acute brain inflammation and oxidative damage are related to long-term cognitive deficits and markers of neurodegeneration in sepsis-survivor rats. Mol Neurobiol. 2014;49:380–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Rengel KF, Hayhurst CJ, Pandharipande PP, Hughes CG. Long-term cognitive and functional impairments after critical illness. Anesth Analg. 2019;128:772–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Fong TG, Bogardus ST Jr, Daftary A, Auerbach E, Blumenfeld H, Modur S, et al. Cerebral perfusion changes in older delirious patients using 99mTc HMPAO SPECT. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2006;61:1294–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Yokota H, Ogawa S, Kurokawa A, Yamamoto Y. Regional cerebral blood flow in delirium patients. Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2003;57:337–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Harvey MA, Davidson JE. Postintensive care syndrome: right care, right now… and later. Crit Care Med. 2016;44:381–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Giorgio A, De Stefano N. Clinical use of brain volumetry. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2013;37:1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Libby Cone, MD, MA, from DMC Corp. (www.dmed.co.jp) for editing drafts of this manuscript.

Funding

This study was supported in part by a medical research grant on Public Trust Foundation of Marumo ER Medicine & Research Institute. The funders had no role in the execution of this study or interpretation of the results.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Nippon Medical School Hospital, 1-1-5, Sendagi, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-8603, Japan

    Ryuta Nakae, Hidetaka Sato & Shoji Yokobori

  2. Department of Radiology, Nippon Medical School Musashi Kosugi Hospital, 1-396, Kosugi-cho, Nakahara-ku, Kawasaki, Kanagawa, 211-8533, Japan

    Tetsuro Sekine & Eigo Kodani

  3. Department of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Nippon Medical School Musashi Kosugi Hospital, 1-396, Kosugi-cho, Nakahara-ku, Kawasaki, Kanagawa, 211-8533, Japan

    Takashi Tagami

  4. Department of Neurosurgery, Nippon Medical School Hospital, 1-1-5, Sendagi, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-8603, Japan

    Yasuo Murai & Akio Morita

  5. PMOD Technologies Ltd., Sumatrastrasse 25, 8006, Zürich, Switzerland

    Geoffrey Warnock

  6. Graduate School of Medical and Health Science, Nippon Sport Science University, 1221-1, Kamoshida-cho, Aoba-ku, Yokohama, Kanagawa, 227-0033, Japan

    Hiroyuki Yokota

Authors
  1. Ryuta Nakae
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Tetsuro Sekine
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Takashi Tagami
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Yasuo Murai
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Eigo Kodani
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Geoffrey Warnock
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Hidetaka Sato
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Akio Morita
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Hiroyuki Yokota
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Shoji Yokobori
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Conception and design of the study: RN. Acquisition of data: RN, TS, and EK. Analysis and interpretation of data: RN and TT. Drafting the article: RN, TS, and TT. Reviewed submitted version of manuscript: all authors. Funding acquisition: RN. Study supervision: YM, GW, HS, AM, HY and SY. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ryuta Nakae.

Ethics declarations

Ethical approval and consent to participate

The Institutional Review Board of Nippon Medical School Hospital approved this study (B-2020-293) and waived the need for informed consent due to the observational nature of the study.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

One author (Geoffrey Warnock) is an employee of PMOD Technologies Ltd. Only non-PMOD employees had control of inclusion of data and information.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1

: Fig. S1. Axial brain computed tomography (CT) sections of a 60-year-old man, who was hospitalized and treated for 60 days for sepsis due to lung abscess. A Brain CT scan on admission. B Brain CT scan obtained 38 days after admission, revealing enlarged lateral ventricles (arrows) and bilateral frontal and temporal lobe cortical sulci (arrowheads).

Additional file 2

: Fig. S2. Axial brain computed tomography (CT) sections of a 65-year-old man, who was hospitalized and treated for 109 days for sepsis due to bacterial pneumonia. A Brain CT scan on admission. B Brain CT scan obtained 65 days after admission, revealing enlarged bilateral frontal and temporal cortical sulci without change in the size of the lateral ventricles (arrowheads).

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Nakae, R., Sekine, T., Tagami, T. et al. Rapidly progressive brain atrophy in septic ICU patients: a retrospective descriptive study using semiautomatic CT volumetry. Crit Care 25, 411 (2021). https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1186/s13054-021-03828-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1186/s13054-021-03828-7

Keywords

Critical Care

ISSN: 1364-8535