From: Efficacy of convalescent plasma for the treatment of severe influenza
Secondary outcomes | Author | H-IVIG/immune plasma group | Control group | P value |
---|---|---|---|---|
Antibody levels | Davey Jr., et al., 2019 [17] Group IFIPS, 2016 [21] | Significantly increases HAI titer levels among patients with influenza A and B | – | – |
Viral loads | Hung et al., 2013 [18] | 3.3 log 10 copies/mL(H1N1) | 4.67 log 10 copies/mL | 0.04 |
Davey Jr., et al., 2019 [17] | Mean log10 RNA − 1.95(Influenza A) | − 2.62 | 0.02 | |
Davey Jr., et al., 2019 [17] | Mean log10 RNA − 2.09(influenza B) | − 1.54 | 0.005 | |
Beigel et al., 2017 [22] | Median log 10 copies per mL 1.9 (1.9–1.9) day 7 (Nasal swab, Influenza A and B) | 1.9 (1.9–1.9) | NS | |
Cytokines | Hung et al., 2013 [18] | TNF-a, IL-1ra, and IL-10 fell to a similar level as control 3 days after treatment | – | – |
Mechanical ventilation, day | Beigel et al., 2017 [22] | 0 (0–6) (influenza A and B) | 3 (0–14) | 0.14 |
Beigel et al., 2019 [16] | 9 (4–16) (influenza A) | 15.5 (7.0–29.0) | 0.22 | |
Length of ICU stay, day | Hung et al., 2013 [18] | 11 (4–13.5) (H1N1) | 10 (4.5–13.5) | NS |
Beigel et al., 2017 [22] | 2.5 (0.0–9.0) (influenza A and B) | 3 (0–13) | 0·37 | |
Beigel et al., 2019 [16] | 5.0(3.0–12.5) (influenza A) | 8 (4–25) | 0.32 | |
Length of hospital stay, day | Hung et al., 2013 [18] | 16 (11.5–13.5) (H1N1) | 16 (7–29) | NS |
Beigel et al., 2017 [22] | 6 (4–16) (influenza A and B) | 11 (5–25) | 0·13 | |
Beigel et al., 2019 [16] | 5 (3–12) (influenza A) | 6 (4–12) | 0.30 | |
Serious adverse events | Beigel et al., 2017 [22] | 20% (influenza A and B) | 38% | 0·041 |
Beigel et al., 2019 [16] | 35% (influenza A) | 32% | NS |