Skip to main content

Table 2 Intervention, sedation monitoring, and study outcomes

From: Remimazolam besylate versus propofol for deep sedation in critically ill patients: a randomized pilot study

 

Remimazolam

(n = 30)

Propofol

(n = 30)

P value

Intervention and sedation monitoring

Study drug treatment

   

   Duration of infusion, h

48.0 (21.5, 48.0)

28.0 (23.5, 48.0)

0.234

   Infusion rate, mg/kg/h

0.60 (0.45, 1.07)

2.53 (1.94, 2.94)

 Infusion rate of remifentanil, μg/kg/h

6.0 (6.0, 6.3)

6.0 (5.7, 6.1)

0.099

 Received rescue sedation

3 (10.0%)

0 (0.0%)

0.237

 Received neuromuscular blockers

12 (40.0%)

7 (23.3%)

0.165

 Received norepinephrine

21 (70.0%)

24 (80.0%)

0.371

   Infusion rate, μg/kg/min

0.06 (0.01, 0.19)

0.07 (0.04, 0.31)

0.148

 Prone positioning

12 (40.0%)

7 (23.3%)

0.165

 RASS score

− 5.0 (− 5.0, − 4.0)

− 5.0 (− 5.0, − 4.0)

0.717

 Narcotrend Index value

28.0 (21.0, 37.0)

29.0 (21.0, 37.0)

0.920

Primary outcome

Percentage of time with a RASS score of -4 or -5 without rescue sedation, %

100 (96.9, 100)

100 (100, 100)

0.168

Secondary outcomes

Ventilator-free hours within 7 days, h

0.0 (0.0, 34.1)

0.0 (0.0, 3.3)

0.256

Successful extubation

13 (43.3%)

7 (23.3%)

0.100

Length of ICU stay, days

23.5 (8.0, 28.0)

28.0 (8.75, 28.0)

0.841

28-day mortality

11 (39.3%)

17 (60.7%)

0.121

Adverse events

   

Hypotension

16 (53.3%)

18 (60.0%)

0.602

Hypotension with intervention

5 (16.7%)

7 (23.3%)

0.519

Bradycardia

0 (0.0%)

0 (0.0%)

  1. Data are number (%), mean (SD), or median (interquartile range)
  2. ICU: Intensive Care Medicine; RASS: Richmond Agitation and Sedation Scale