Skip to main content

Table 1 General characteristics of all included studies

From: Extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation versus conventional CPR in cardiac arrest: an updated meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis

Study

Study type

Region

Location of arrest

Intervention

Sample size/persons

Age/years

Initial presenting rhythm/persons

In-hospital mortality/

persons

30-day survival/

persons

Short-term favourable neurological outcome

/persons

Belohlavek (2022) [6]

RCT

Europe

Out-of-hospital

ECPR

124

59 ± 13.5

72 VF

31 asystole

21 PEA

84

52

38

CCPR

132

57 ± 13.49

84 VF

24 asystole

24 PEA

101

43

24

Blumenstein (2016)[15]

PSM

Europe

In-hospital

ECPR

52

72 ± 17.46

32 sinus without AV block

15 atrial fibrillation

1 AV block III

1 VT

3 unspecified

38

14

11

CCPR

52

73 ± 7.62

29 sinus without AV block

13 atrial fibrillation

3 AV block III

3 PEA

2 VT

2 asystole

43

9

7

Chen (2008)[16]

PSM

Asia

In-hospital

ECPR

46

57 ± 14

21 VT/VF

15 PEA

10 asystole

31

16

14

CCPR

46

55 ± 15

19 VT/VF

18 PEA

9 asystole

38

8

7

Choi (2023) [9]

PSM

Asia

Out-of-hospital

ECPR

458

55.5 ± 14.1

271 VT/VF

96 PEA

91 asystole

391

N/A

47

CCPR

1832

56.4 ± 16.1

1052 VT/VF

394 PEA

386 asystole

1578

N/A

127

Jeong (2022) [17]

PSM

Asia

Out-of-hospital

ECPR

271

58.0 ± 13.4

N/A

226

45

35

CCPR

271

58.3 ± 17.9

218

53

44

Kim (2020) [14]

PSM

Asia

Out-of-hospital

ECPR

3826

59.8 ± 14.9

N/A

2873

953

N/A

CCPR

3826

59.7 ± 15.1

3080

746

N/A

Lin (2010) [18]

PSM

Asia

In-hospital

ECPR

27

59 ± 11

15 VT/VF

7 PEA

5 asystole

19

9

7

CCPR

27

60 ± 13

18 VT/VF

6 PEA

3 asystole

22

7

5

Maekawa (2013) [19]

PSM

Asia

Out-of-hospital

ECPR

24

57 ± 11.82

13 VT/VF

15

N/A

N/A

CCPR

24

57 ± 14.19

14 VT/VF

21

N/A

N/A

Okada (2023) [8]

(shockable rhythm cohort)

PSM

Asia

Out-of-hospital

ECPR

913

58.3 ± 14.9

913 VT/VF

688*

225

109

CCPR

913

59.0 ± 16.3

913 VT/VF

764*

149

100

Okada (2023) [8] (non-shockable rhythm cohort)

PSM

Asia

Out-of-hospital

ECPR

370

58.7 ± 16.4

237 PEA

133 asystole

326*

44

17

CCPR

370

57.3 ± 17.9

239 PEA

131 asystole

361*

9

4

Patricio (2019) [20]

PSM

Europe

Both in- and out-of-hospital

ECPR

80

57 ± 14

24 VF/VT

35 asystole

21 PEA

62

N/A

N/A

CCPR

80

57 ± 17

23 VT/VF

38 asystole

19 PEA

66

N/A

N/A

Shin (2011/13) [23, 24]

PSM

Asia

Out-of-hospital

ECPR

60

60.8 ± 14.5

13 VT/VF

41 PEA

6 asystole

41

19

14

CCPR

60

60.5 ± 15.5

13 VT/VF

41 PEA

6 asystole

54

6

3

Suverein (2023) [4]

RCT

Europe

Out-of-hospital

ECPR

70

54 ± 12

69 VT/VF/PEA

11 secondary arrhythmia

1 Pulmonary embolism

56

N/A

14

CCPR

64

57 ± 10

63 VT/VF/PEA

11 secondary arrhythmia

0 pulmonary embolism

51

N/A

10

Yannopoulos (2020) [5]

RCT

North America

Out-of-hospital

ECPR

15

59 ± 10

15 VF

9

N/A

N/A

CCPR

15

58 ± 11

15 VF

14

N/A

N/A

  1. AMI acute myocardial infarction, AV atrioventricular, AVR aortic valve replacement, CABG coronary artery bypass graft, CAD coronary artery disease, CCPR conventional cardiopulmonary resuscitation, ECPR extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation, HF heart failure, ICD implantable cardiac defibrillator, LVEF left ventricular ejection fraction, MVR mitral valve replacement, N/A not available, PCI percutaneous coronary intervention, PEA pulse electrical activity, PSM propensity score matched study, RCT randomised controlled trial, VF ventricular fibrillation, and VT ventricular tachycardia. In-hospital mortality is imputed by 30-day survival