Skip to main content

Table 3 Results of meta-analysis for primary and secondary outcomes of attaining aggressive vs. conservative PK/PD targets of beta-lactams in critically ill patients

From: Impact of attaining aggressive vs. conservative PK/PD target on the clinical efficacy of beta-lactams for the treatment of Gram-negative infections in the critically ill patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Outcome

Studies

PK/PD target assessed

No. of patients (Aggressive vs. conservative PK/PD targets)

Odds ratio (95% CI)

Heterogeneity (I2; p value)

Publication bias (p value Egger’s test)

Clinical cure

8

100%fT>4–5 x MIC

fCss/MIC > 4–5

701 vs. 1172

1.69

(1.15–2.49)

p = 0.007

73.8%

p = 0.004

0.10

Microbiological failure

3

fCss/MIC < 4–5

175 vs. 42

26.08

(8.72–77.95)

p < 0.001

0.0%

p = 0.66

0.73

Resistance occurrence

3

100%fT>4–5 x MIC

fCss/MIC > 4–5

269 vs. 96

0.06

(0.01–0.29)

p < 0.001

69.7%

p = 0.04

0.62

Mortality rate

2

100%fT>4 x MIC

269 vs. 150

0.82

(0.36–1.85)

p = 0.63

58.9%

p = 0.12

NA

Survival rate

3

100%fT>4–5 x MIC

313 vs. 759

1.15

(0.50–2.66)

p = 0.75

66.2%

p = 0.05

0.33

  1. CI confidence interval, Css steady-state concentration, MIC minimum inhibitory concentration, NA not applicable, PK/PD pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic